Exactly How Are Western Values Superior to That of the Moslems?

Jews are at war with nature… Thus, their push for all these insanity. And yes, moodslimes can do whatever the fuck they want in their countries, we shouldn’t make the same mistakes than the stupid SJW do-gooders make. You can’t teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig.

Grandpa Lampshade's Semitic Truth Center

***** THIS ARTICLE IS GOING TO COVER SOME VERY DISGUSTING TOPICS. I KNOW SOME OF YOU USE MY WORK IN HOMESCHOOLING FOR YOUR KIDS, THUS YOU MAY WISH TO READ THROUGH THIS FIRST AND MAKE A DETERMINATION AS TO BEING APPROPRIATE ACCORDING TO THEIR AGE****

I was going to discuss this on the next show but instead decided to cover it here, as I think the written medium will be more effective as well as being able to link to actual details. As you all well know, nobody is harder on these brown desert people (aka Moslems) than Grandpa Lampshade. However I find somethings hypocritical when it comes to claiming that so called “western values” are somehow superior to the values of these brown desert people.

111Triggered yet?

When we say “western values” what do we mean exactly? For most of us, it means “white people’s values” but this isn’t…

Ver la entrada original 1.634 palabras más

Losing Their Gun Rights With Barely a Whimper | The American Spectator

Americans, don’t be stupid!! You guys are privileged to have the right to bear arms… Most countries do not, or they put stupid draconian laws to obey if you want to buy one. Really, you guys are lucky.

rudolfblog

Ver la entrada original

Where is Loove in this sad world…?

The joos sure love us……… not!!!

rudolfblog

Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself,’ – Really? 

… Matt Rosenberg, the Hillel rabbi at Texas A&M University, sought to convince white-supremacist Richard Spencer of the error of his ways by citing a ‘Torah’ message of ‘radical inclusion and love’. Spencer masterfully responded by citing Israeli policy, Zionism and Jewish exclusivity, which left Rosenberg speechless. Rosenberg professed that this ‘radical inclusion and love’ is what the Torah teaches. But is this really true?  … Classical Jewish Talmudic tradition is full of qualifications that not only distinguish ethics between Jews and non-Jews – it even contains opinions that regard a Jewish soul as blessed and elevated above the level of the gentiles … Whilst there are milder interpretations, these opinions certainly leave a wide space for perceiving non-Jews as lesser than human.

Ver la entrada original

VIOLENCE

Read this article. It’s long, but explains a lot of things, for example, why the ballot box is not going to help us sort this out…

Remember The 14 Words


Within the broad circle of White Nationalism, the subject of violence is a contentious topic due to the prevalence of System informants and the unrealistic expectations that we can win by staying entirely within our own risk free comfort zones. The idea that violence is inherently a big no no misses a crucial point: simply having semitically incorrect views is inherently predicated on the threat of violence.
The Jewish System will not voluntarily relinquish power if we somehow “win” by playing by its own rules. The System has proven time and time again that its rules are devised to keep other players out of the game, and will break its own rules whenever it can to eliminate rivals it cannot control. Simply put, the law isn’t some magic force of impartiality and objective judgement that majestically swoops down and rewards people for coloring inside its lines while punishing bad guys…

Ver la entrada original 42 palabras más

THE HITLER-IN-ARGENTINA MYTH

The old myth that refuses to die!! Really! For all the seasons! We are hit with these histories about Hitler-in-Argentina from time to time!!

Remember The 14 Words


Over the past 15 years or so, a new industry has emerged to target the ‘conspiracy theory’ community. It appears as though a quick dollar can be made by peddling “Hitler and Eva escaped to Argentina” books to some of the more vulnerable contrarians who have, understandably, developed the habit of doubting everything that we were ever taught about history or are being told about current events.
Napoleon was absolutely spot-on when he observed: “History is the fables that men have agreed upon.” However, just because so much of what we have been taught about history is false, it does not logically follow that everything is false, and that every counter-claim must be accepted at face value. The same rules of evidence must apply to ‘conspiracy theories’ as do towards ‘official stories’.

It’s a fantastic story, told (and sold) with great passion, but is there any logical basis to it?

Ver la entrada original 356 palabras más