[This began as a comment in other of my posts so don’t expect much in-depth here. Basically, this has a bit to do with the so called «classes» that the Marxist (jewish in core) ideologies insist to label people into, and to incite class-warfare into the society body as well…]
Nowadays we have a very materialistic view ruling onto us… We tend to look up to the guys who make money* (no matter HOW they did it) and to look at the underclass as undesirables. This can’t be good, and this can’t go on. Marxists and other radicals tended to use the proletarians (those who only had their own children) as a tool to overthrow the social order… now they changed tactics since some of the lower classes are still White. Now they see the downtrodden as part of racial minorities, and, somehow, they are still right.**
With affirmative action and the barring de facto of Whites on key positions, minorities can access/achieve more than ever… Take that from them, and they seldom can rise by their own efforts. If there is not a helping hand, they don’t go up the social ladder. But…
Returning to what I said at the beginning [of this text], we know that the game is rigged by jews who help each other. And that people look up at those who have money as heroes and role models is also an indicative that the only thing that matters now is money.
There are not classes anymore, proper. Most of us are proles, even if we are well off and hold good paying jobs. Take the good paying jobs from people… what is left? Their meager savings and maybe (if they happen to play the roulette that passes as the stock market) by having some shares of a company… But not much more than that.***
I believe, that people call “elites” what we, in other context, would simply call “oligarchs”. The “elite” of anything is conformed by the best people… can you seriously say that these people are better than us? No, their defining element is money and, if they have to stupidify large masses of people in order to rule, maybe they aren’t so good as one might believe.
Aristocracy proper is dead, too. Or scattered. Nobility is pozzed as hell, and infiltrated with jews as well.
The merchant men are the rulers. Have you**** ever heard the phrase: “people vote with their money”? It refers to purchasing stuff, of course, but the analogy is quite telling, nonetheless.
We are proles, no matter how much we have… And the mistreatment stems of some superficial differences, but deep enough to make people look at each other with fear, distrust, and envy.
Hitler tried to bridge those differences. His “experiment” got thwarted by the war and the short duration of his rule. Maybe, if the NSDAP had ruled a bit more, we might have witnessed a different society.
No matter how well off or poor is someone, if he is White, he is your brother.
Marxists (jews) still harp about class divisions, because they know it works, despite having shifted a bit their focus. It’s another tool on their toolbox…
*Just look at Donald Trump, for example. He is not a classic politician, but he ended up being the new POTUS. Here we have a similar example with Mauricio Macri. Engineer by trade, although he lived on daddy’s monies and he has always worked on the familial emporium of the Macri family. Yes, I know, the democratic game is a rigged and pointless one. But people look up to businessmen and other moneyed people (like rich socialites and football players) as role models. People look up to them as examples of hard-working (although it might sound more or less incredible), successful people. They are good at playing the rat game. I can name more examples of this, but the reader probably can name more examples as well.
**Marxists/jews use minorities (and guilt-ridden, mostly rich Whites) as «agents of change» now. They might be downtrodden or not, but they have to be minorities. They shifted tactics probably 50 or 60 years ago, maybe the Civil Rights Movement marked that shift more than anything. For the first time, minorities (negroes, at that time) would be used in a weaponized way by the jews, in an overt way.
You might notice that I am saying «Marxists/jews» instead of saying only «jews»… I am not trying to muddy the waters, I am just pointing that the Marxian version of judaism is which uses the terms «classes», «class warfare» «bourgeoisie» and «proletarians» more than anyone else.
***Or a house, if they are a bit lucky. But not much more than that. I recall reading a phrase on the meaning of the word: «job»… Just Over Broke.
****That was referred to the person I was replying originally to, that’s why it has that personal tone. But it’s a good point anyway.
It stems from the comparison of ballots to dollars. Purchasing power used to buy something might be compared as casting a vote to a candidate in the democratic elections system.