Look at the jewboy saying “Fellow White people…”
While he is not. He should kill himself or STFU.
One myth of our times is that official history is – or even can be – objective and true. Inconvenient facts are routinely suppressed, trivialized or ignored in official histories. So much of what passes for “history” is propaganda, even crude propaganda. The late Dr. Harry Elmer Barnes told his students and readers of the need for bringing history into accord with the facts. That is the purpose of true historical revisionism: to make historiography objective, factual and true. We must critically examine what currently is claimed as history to verify its veracity or lack thereof.
In this essay, we offer a number of links to well researched and thought provoking articles on some hot button historical issues. The reader can choose what to read and what not to read. As well, each individual will have to decide for him or herself what is the truth. A discussion about whether humans…
Ver la entrada original 482 palabras más
[It’s pretty short, so I will paste this entry from the National Vanguard on its entirety. Now, don’t you think that it’s a bit strange that almost EVERY important person, or person of relevance had bad views on the jews…? Like, the jews are universally reviled by a lot of people from every walk of life. Really.]
Immanuel Kant on the Jews
“Every coward is a liar; Jews for example, not only in business, but also in common life.” Source
“The Jews still cannot claim any true genius, any truly great man. All their talents and skills revolve around stratagems and low cunning…They are a nation of swindlers.” Source
The Jews are by nature “sharp dealers” who are “bound together by superstition.” Their “immoral and vile” behavior in commerce shows that they “do not aspire to civic virtue,” for “the spirit of usury holds sway amongst them.” They are “a nation of swindlers” who benefit only “from deceiving their host’s culture.” Source
“The Palestinians [Jews thought to have originated in Palestine] living among us have, for the most part, earned a not unfounded reputation for being cheaters, because of their spirit of usury since their exile. Certainly, it seems strange to conceive of a nation of cheaters; but it is just as odd to think of a nation of merchants, the great majority of whom, bound by an ancient superstition that is recognized by the State they live in, seek no civil dignity and try to make up for this loss by the advantage of duping the people among whom they find refuge, and even one another. The situation could not be otherwise, given a whole nation of merchants, as non-productive members of society (for example, the Jews in Poland). So their constitution, which is sanctioned by ancient precepts and even by the people among whom they live (since we have certain sacred writings in common with them), cannot consistently be abolished — even though the supreme principle of their morality in trading with us is “Let the buyer beware.” I shall not engage in the futile undertaking of lecturing to these people, in terms of morality, about cheating and honesty. Instead, I shall present my conjectures about the origin of this peculiar constitution (the constitution, namely, of a nation of merchants).” [Quoted in Immanuel Kant, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, tr. Mary J. Gregor (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1974), p. 77.] Source
Sources from the article show the different quotes. This article comes from…
[This began as a comment in other of my posts so don’t expect much in-depth here. Basically, this has a bit to do with the so called “classes” that the Marxist (jewish in core) ideologies insist to label people into, and to incite class-warfare into the society body as well…]
Nowadays we have a very materialistic view ruling onto us… We tend to look up to the guys who make money* (no matter HOW they did it) and to look at the underclass as undesirables. This can’t be good, and this can’t go on. Marxists and other radicals tended to use the proletarians (those who only had their own children) as a tool to overthrow the social order… now they changed tactics since some of the lower classes are still White. Now they see the downtrodden as part of racial minorities, and, somehow, they are still right.**
With affirmative action and the barring de facto of Whites on key positions, minorities can access/achieve more than ever… Take that from them, and they seldom can rise by their own efforts. If there is not a helping hand, they don’t go up the social ladder. But…
Returning to what I said at the beginning [of this text], we know that the game is rigged by jews who help each other. And that people look up at those who have money as heroes and role models is also an indicative that the only thing that matters now is money.
There are not classes anymore, proper. Most of us are proles, even if we are well off and hold good paying jobs. Take the good paying jobs from people… what is left? Their meager savings and maybe (if they happen to play the roulette that passes as the stock market) by having some shares of a company… But not much more than that.***
I believe, that people call “elites” what we, in other context, would simply call “oligarchs”. The “elite” of anything is conformed by the best people… can you seriously say that these people are better than us? No, their defining element is money and, if they have to stupidify large masses of people in order to rule, maybe they aren’t so good as one might believe.
Aristocracy proper is dead, too. Or scattered. Nobility is pozzed as hell, and infiltrated with jews as well.
The merchant men are the rulers. Have you**** ever heard the phrase: “people vote with their money”? It refers to purchasing stuff, of course, but the analogy is quite telling, nonetheless.
We are proles, no matter how much we have… And the mistreatment stems of some superficial differences, but deep enough to make people look at each other with fear, distrust, and envy.
Hitler tried to bridge those differences. His “experiment” got thwarted by the war and the short duration of his rule. Maybe, if the NSDAP had ruled a bit more, we might have witnessed a different society.
No matter how well off or poor is someone, if he is White, he is your brother.
Marxists (jews) still harp about class divisions, because they know it works, despite having shifted a bit their focus. It’s another tool on their toolbox…
*Just look at Donald Trump, for example. He is not a classic politician, but he ended up being the new POTUS. Here we have a similar example with Mauricio Macri. Engineer by trade, although he lived on daddy’s monies and he has always worked on the familial emporium of the Macri family. Yes, I know, the democratic game is a rigged and pointless one. But people look up to businessmen and other moneyed people (like rich socialites and football players) as role models. People look up to them as examples of hard-working (although it might sound more or less incredible), successful people. They are good at playing the rat game. I can name more examples of this, but the reader probably can name more examples as well.
**Marxists/jews use minorities (and guilt-ridden, mostly rich Whites) as “agents of change” now. They might be downtrodden or not, but they have to be minorities. They shifted tactics probably 50 or 60 years ago, maybe the Civil Rights Movement marked that shift more than anything. For the first time, minorities (negroes, at that time) would be used in a weaponized way by the jews, in an overt way.
You might notice that I am saying “Marxists/jews” instead of saying only “jews”… I am not trying to muddy the waters, I am just pointing that the Marxian version of judaism is which uses the terms “classes”, “class warfare” “bourgeoisie” and “proletarians” more than anyone else.
***Or a house, if they are a bit lucky. But not much more than that. I recall reading a phrase on the meaning of the word: “job”… Just Over Broke.
****That was referred to the person I was replying originally to, that’s why it has that personal tone. But it’s a good point anyway.
It stems from the comparison of ballots to dollars. Purchasing power used to buy something might be compared as casting a vote to a candidate in the democratic elections system.
ed note–please read through this carefully, and pay particular attention to those sections highlighted in red.
As we say here often, those who engage in the ridiculous assertion that Judaism and the toxic thought processes that it produces are inconsequential to the bigger events taking place on the world stage do so at the peril of the entire planet. Judaism is not some tangential philosophy being practiced by just a handful of cultists living in some remote mountainous area no one has ever heard of. It is LITERALLY the operating system of all Western politics/policies these days and maintains a stranglehold over the economic, cultural, military and media levers of western society, which is THE dominant player on the world stage these days.
Having said this, it is important to remember that the manner by which these rabbis carry themselves, in a very unassuming way, dressing very modestly, not living…
Ver la entrada original 2.938 palabras más