Crazy times indeed! Mentally ill people thinks they know more than experts on the field… Just read this news piece to check their M.O…
They should be locked in a mental institution for trying to make their insanity appear as «normal».
[From Rudolf’s blog, by Romanianalien. The temptation is too great to let this piece of «news» untreated… My comments in italics.]
An eight-month-old baby is possibly the first person in the world to have their gender marked as ‘unknown’ on their health card.
Wait a second! Her/him/its mother/father/spawner waited eight months to register her/his/its child…? Or did they revoke the old, gender correct card, issuing a new card with the «U» on it? I don’t understand!
Searyl Atli’s gender has marked with a ‘U’ on her Canadian health card, standing for ‘undetermined’ or ‘unassigned’.
Errr… what? «Has marked»? The kid did mark the card? Come on, dude, how the hell do you expect me to understand this story if you cock-up like this?
The baby’s parent, Kori Doty, does not identify as male or female and prefers to use the pronoun ‘they’, and wants to raise Searyl’s genderless until the baby has a “sense of self and command of vocabulary to tell me who they are”.
The baby’s parent (lovely, OP doesn’t say «mother» or «father» because he/she/it doesn’t know the gender of it), Kori Doty (what kind of fucking name it’s Kori?) wants to raise its child genderless (I’m gonna use from now on the pronoun «it» to refer to the child’s parent/spawner) until the baby can tell it: «Momma, I has a <insert sexual organ here>, call me a boy/girl/sexual helicopter».
Look at its spawner. Poor kid…
Doty wants to keep Searyl’s gender off of all official records until that day, according to CBC.
They said: “I’m recognising them as a baby and trying to give them all the love and support to be the most whole person that they can be outside of the restrictions that come with the boy box and the girl box.”
«They said?» This shit gets confusing. Who is «they»? Ah, I remembered, it’s the kid’s spawner. (I refuse to call it a «mother», maybe it gets offended, you know).
British Columbia (BC) has so far refused Doty’s request to have Searyl’s birth certificate issued without a gender marker.
Maybe it’s because shit gets more confusing. Like, life is already complicated, don’t complicate it even more, child. Simplicity has its beauty.
Doty, along with the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal argue that the omission of gender should apply to all government documents for everyone in BC and Canada.
I have a suggestion. Why instead they don’t issue a birth certificate at all? Let’s cut the crap with the governmental registration and stuff. Let the kid choose its own name as well. Heck, if it wants to be called «Cyanide Pill» or «SissyBoi69», we should let it, right? Or better, let it choose its own parents! In this case, the kid is going to win with almost any choice he makes…
Provinces including Ontario are reviewing their policies and may include a non-bonar gender option on official documents in the future.
Doty believes that people who want to change their gender after in life have to go through a difficult process and instead wants a third option from birth.
Well, if you count the balls uprooting, dick chopping and tit-putting for the gents, and the cunt-closing, tit chopping, dick-putting for the ladies, plus the hormonal treatments and sheeeit, then yes, it’s kinda hard…
They* It added: “When I was born, doctors looked at my genitals and made assumptions about who I would be, and those assignments followed me and followed my identification throughout my life”.
*(fuck you, I’m gonna call you an «it».) Why, instead of saying «I», you don’t say: «theyself» or some shit like that? Why we have to put up with half-assed solutions, why? Doctors weren’t going to pretend they were blind or some shit like that. Want to be cured? You need a doctor who knows what the fuck he is doing! And he needs to be not a fucktard, and not pander to some obvious shit… You know, medicine is a hard science… Hard sciences mean that you can’t say «2+2=5», because it’s not 5. It’s 4, and you can’t change that. Moron.
“Those assumptions were incorrect, and I ended up having to do a lot of adjustments since then…”
GM has an adjustment for ye…
What a fucking moron. And you need the source to check if it really says «non-bonar» or if I made that shit up.
[An interesting view… from someone who doesn’t see the forest for the trees. A libertarian, aka, a masochist. If you see the problem and fail (or refuse) to act upon it, then you are no better than the guys who don’t see it at all. Notice that he doesn’t like us NaZZis reblogging his stuff. If we were so «intolerant» and «bigoted», we wouldn’t bother with his point of view at all. Cartier found it before me (on the 07/12/16, before he wrote that notice. Check her reblog here to compare), and that’s probably the reason that he added the notice update to his post… A shame, because it’s still good. Also, I reblogged it for the lulz and educational purposes, with the last note and all…]
Revised on 12/05/16, with the addition of the penultimate paragraph, a related reading, and two more links under “other related posts.”
Revised on 12/07/16 with the addition of this statement:
I have turned off comments, pingbacks, and likes for this post. It seems to have attracted the attention of persons with a neo-Nazi political agenda. This post is emphatically not about the suppression of any person or group of persons because of his or her sexual preferences. It is about the regrettable decisions that some young persons make about their sexuality. And it is about the cheerleading for transgenderism on the part of “liberals,” pundits, and politicians who seem not to care one whit about the destructive social consequences of the policies that they wish to ram down the throats of the 99.4 percent of Americans who are not transgendered.
[Me again. Herp derp. Refusal to act it’s the same than not recognizing the problem at all, I repeat. Does he think of magic solutions or what? He is ignorant about what Nationalsocialism is about.]
You know what “hateful discriminatory” speech is. It’s speech that offends a leftist’s precious prejudices. A good example is found in a recent post here, “The IQ of Nations.” The post is based on facts, insofar as they can be ascertained, about the average IQs of the people of 159 countries. But because the post contradicts what leftists want to believe, or profess to believe, about the correlation between race and intelligence, it is — by their definition — “hateful and discriminatory.”
It’s also “hateful and discriminatory” to suggest that transgenderism is, for the most part, a fad. Worse than that, it’s a fad that will leave much harm in its wake while further diminishing the liberty of Americans. I hereby plead guilty, in advance, to the propagation of “hateful and discriminatory” speech facts.
Among the subjects addressed by Drs. Lawrence Mayer and Paul McHugh in “Sexuality and Gender” (The New Atlantis No. 50, Fall 2016) is gender identity. The executive summary of Part Three, which addresses that subject, gives these findings:
● The hypothesis that gender identity is an innate, fixed property of human beings that is independent of biological sex — that a person might be “a man trapped in a woman’s body” or “a woman trapped in a man’s body” — is not supported by scientific evidence.
● According to a recent estimate, about 0.6% of U.S. adults identify as a gender that does not correspond to their biological sex.
● Studies comparing the brain structures of transgender and non-transgender individuals have demonstrated weak correlations between brain structure and cross-gender identification. These correlations do not provide any evidence for a neurobiological basis for cross-gender identification.
● Compared to the general population, adults who have undergone sex-reassignment surgery continue to have a higher risk of experiencing poor mental health outcomes. One study found that, compared to controls, sex-reassigned individuals were about 5 times more likely to attempt suicide and about 19 times more likely to die by suicide.
● Children are a special case when addressing transgender issues. Only a minority of children who experience cross-gender identification will continue to do so into adolescence or adulthood.
● There is little scientific evidence for the therapeutic value of interventions that delay puberty or modify the secondary sex characteristics of adolescents, although some children may have improved psychological well-being if they are encouraged and supported in their cross-gender identification. There is no evidence that all children who express gender-atypical thoughts or behavior should be encouraged to become transgender…
Author John Wear reveals evidence contradicting the narrative we have been taught about Germany, Japan & the Allies in World War II. WEARS WAR is the battle to bring FAKE HISTORY into accord with the facts.